<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nowy WordPress 2.9 Carmen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chyl.org/2009/12/nowy-wordpress-2-9-carmen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chyl.org/2009/12/nowy-wordpress-2-9-carmen/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:41:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BM</title>
		<link>http://www.chyl.org/2009/12/nowy-wordpress-2-9-carmen/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>BM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chyl.org/?p=1221#comment-482</guid>
		<description>Enjoyed your take on WordPress 2.9. I agree. WP 2.9 is a solid update, but am still looking for more in WordPress 3.0. Here&#039;s my thoughts on the newest version of WordPress.

http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/Web_Development/Blogs/WordPress/WordPress-2-9-What-to-Expect-When-Upgrading-to-WordPress-2-9.html?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed your take on WordPress 2.9. I agree. WP 2.9 is a solid update, but am still looking for more in WordPress 3.0. Here&#8217;s my thoughts on the newest version of WordPress.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/Web_Development/Blogs/WordPress/WordPress-2-9-What-to-Expect-When-Upgrading-to-WordPress-2-9.html?" rel="nofollow">http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/Web_Development/Blogs/WordPress/WordPress-2-9-What-to-Expect-When-Upgrading-to-WordPress-2-9.html?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

